Quarterly M&A Comparison

Globally, both the volume and value of M&A transactions slowed in the first quarter of 2016.  Private Equity transactions were not exempt from this slowdown, which is being caused by tightening credit to finance transactions, election uncertainty, and lower confidence in the economy.

With regard to the volume of Private Equity transactions, the following chart depicts the Q1 2016 slowdown.  More specifically, Q1 2016 was almost 17 percent lower than Q1 2015.

With regard to the value of Private Equity transactions in the first quarter, the slump in the number of completed transactions was even more apparent.  The value of transactions in Q1 2016 versus Q1 2015 decreased by 34 percent.  The major factor contributing to this was the simple fact that there was a dramatic slowing of very large transactions.

Private Equity buyers still have plenty of “dry powder” and continue to look for transactions across all sectors.  Their investors are always looking for good returns, which can only happen if the Private Equity firm is invested.  In addition, while Private Equity buyers frequently don’t outbid strategic buyers, they do offer competitive valuations.  Furthermore, they provide business owners that are selling a very viable alternative with lots of other benefits.

The key to closing a successful transaction, particularly if the goal is to do that in 2016 is to explore the topic and develop definitive objectives.  Many sellers wait too long or have this fuzzy notion that a qualified buyer will seek them out.  Neither scenario achieves the best value.  

Versailles Group is a 29-year-old Boston-based investment bank that specializes in international mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures.  Versailles Group’s skill, flexibility, and experience have enabled it to successfully close M&A transactions for companies with revenues between US$2 million and US$250 million.  Versailles Group has closed transactions in all economic environments, literally around the world.

Versailles Group provides clients with both buy-side and sell-side M&A services, and has been completing cross-border transactions since its founding in 1987.  More information on Versailles Group, Ltd. can be found at www.versaillesgroup.com.

For more information, please contact

Donald Grava

Founder and President

+617-449-3325

 May 23, 2016 

M&A - Financial Versus Strategic Buyers

M&A - Financial Versus Strategic Buyers

M&A buyers are usually classified as either strategic or financial buyers.  Strategic buyers are companies actively pursuing opportunities to grow or diversify their revenue sources in the seller’s market.  Strategic buyers represent about 70 percent of the total M&A market.  Usually, a strategic buyer will have something in common with the selling company; they can be competitors, suppliers, customers, or even an unrelated company with a complimentary product looking to gain access to the seller’s industry, market, or business. Ultimately, they are looking for a company with attributes that can be integrated into their established business strategy to create synergy - the concept that the value of two companies combined is greater than the sum of the separate individual parts.  (Sometimes, strategics make acquisitions to diversify.)

Financial buyers look for good businesses they can build up over a few years and then sell to make a profit.  Private equity, venture capital, family offices, and some hedge funds are good examples of financial buyers.  Their acquisitions comprise the remaining 30 percent of the M&A market.  They look for growth prospects, good management, and future exit opportunities.  Rather than integrate the company into their own, they work with the seller’s management team to understand what resources they need and help obtain them, in an effort to foster growth.

During the Transaction 

Understanding the end goals of both financial and strategic buyers is essential to understanding how and why their approaches differ.  After the transaction, a strategic buyer will consolidate the target business with their business systems, controls, and management to recognize synergies from the integration of the two organizations.  If it’s a total integration, this may present a challenge for a seller that is looking to remain active in the company.  In this case, the best alternative is a financial buyer, who typically allows the company to run as a stand-alone entity.  In contrast, the financial buyer’s goal is to improve the business operations in order to make the company a more attractive investment to a future acquirer. 

Efficiency of the Transaction

Typically, a financial buyer has completed many deals before and has developed a kind of “playbook” to follow making the process flow along more efficiently than an inexperienced strategic buyer.  However, financial buyers tend to be more thorough in their diligence, for a couple reasons.  First, they have to take the time to learn about the industry they will be entering, whereas a strategic buyer generally has strong industry knowledge and has already developed an outlook for the future.  Additionally, things that may make sense to a strategic buyer may become an issue for a financial buyer who doesn’t understand industry norms.  

Secondly, a financial buyer is more likely to keep the current personnel in place than a strategic buyer.  Thus, the diligence process will have a stronger focus on the infrastructure of the target company.  Effectively, strategic buyers will focus on validation and the ability to integrate the target into their business model and financial buyers, in addition, will have to study the business model, the personnel, and much more.  

Consideration

One of the most important issues for sellers is the amount of consideration paid by each type of buyer.  Generally, a strategic buyer will offer greater consideration than a financial buyer.  In essence, financial buyers are purchasing explicitly what the company has to offer.  They buy the expected future earnings, in hopes to expand the cash flow beyond what the company has done previously, but they do not pay for that potential.  Usually, a strategic buyer will pay a premium to recognize the synergies that make the transaction attractive.  Almost immediately after closing, a strategic buyer will recognize synergistic benefits.  These benefits can be attributed to various factors that will depend on the organizations involved but can include greater market share, combined talent, and cost reduction.  Most importantly, the more realizable the synergies are, the more the purchaser will be willing to pay.  

There are also defensive reasons for a strategic buyer to pay a premium.  Suppose there are three companies who sell the same product; two with large distribution networks and significant market share.  The third company lacks the sales capability but they know how to produce the product for much less.  If the third company were to sell itself, it would make sense that the other two would pay a significant premium to prevent the other from acquiring the low cost producing seller.  In this scenario, a financial buyer would be outbid as they would be unwilling to pay a defensive premium. 

While the differences between strategic and financial buyers are evident, there is no clear answer as to what type of buyer is best for a seller.  The best way to discover what is right for the seller is to reach out to both strategic and financial buyers.  Understanding the characteristics and intentions of the target and acquiring entities is essential in making the right decision.  Aside from the obvious benefits of fostering competition, reaching out to both types of buyers present the opportunity for the seller to see more options and ultimately better understand what is in their best interest.  It’s also the best way to drive the highest possible valuation.

Versailles Group is a 29-year-old Boston-based investment bank that specializes in international mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures.  Versailles Group’s skill, flexibility, and experience have enabled it to successfully close M&A transactions for companies with revenues between US$2 million and US$250 million.  Versailles Group has closed transactions in all economic environments, literally around the world.

Versailles Group provides clients with both buy-side and sell-side M&A services, and has been completing cross-border transactions since its founding in 1987.  More information on Versailles Group, Ltd. can be found at www.versaillesgroup.com.

For more information, please contact

Donald Grava

Founder and President

+617-449-3325

May 18, 2016

Quarterly M&A Comparison

Global M&A activity in the first quarter of 2016 decreased in comparison to the last eight quarters.

As depicted in the graph below, in terms of volume, Q1 2016 was the lowest in the past two years.  Despite the decrease, there were still approximately 20,000 transactions completed in just three months.

In terms of the aggregate value of M&A transactions, Q1 2016 was not the lowest in the past eight quarters.  Q1 2014 was actually lower.  The reduction of value reflects a slowing of mega-mergers, which sometimes skew the statistics particularly when one is focused on the lower middle market.

In the lower middle market, M&A activity remains robust, but it's important for both buyers and sellers to make sure that they are addressing the entire market.  For example, sellers should make sure that they are contacting buyers internationally.  Buyers should make sure that they are contacting targets in their entire marketplace to insure that they have the ability to comparison shop and complete the best possible transaction.

One of the biggest challenges to completing an M&A transaction is to make sure that the buyer or seller have engaged a well-experienced advisor that has experience in the international arena.  The world has gotten “smaller,” largely due to the improvements in communications.  In the “old” days, say prior to 1982, international telephone calls were extremely expensive, faxes didn’t exist, and telex was a worldwide standard, but slow and expensive.  To summarize, email, cheap telephone calls, etc. have made it easy for people to communicate worldwide.  But, many M&A advisors don’t have the experience to deal with people with different customs and cultures.  Versailles Group has nearly 30 years of dealing with buyers and sellers around the world.  We use a culturally sensitive approach that allows us to successfully complete transactions that increase shareholder value on both sides of the negotiating table.  Win win negotiating always works best!

May 11, 2016

M&A Negotiations

M&A Negotiations

In negotiating a merger, an acquisition, or a divestiture the ultimate goal is to structure a deal in which separate companies complete a transaction that generates shareholder value for both buyer and seller.

M&A negotiations are one of the more complex aspects of an M&A transaction and it’s always a good idea to have an experienced M&A advisor performing this task.   While there are some minor negotiations that occur in the earlier stages of the M&A process, the most important negotiations relate to the value and terms of the proposed transaction.  The value usually isn’t a complex concept, but earnouts, and other forms of consideration can be tricky, particularly for an entrepreneur who has not completed a large number of transactions.  There are many important items that need to be negotiated, for example, there is the issue of a holdback versus an escrow and what percentage of the transaction consideration this will be.  The holdback or escrow provides the buyer with protection against unforeseen liabilities.  Many sellers worry that they’ll never see this money; however, provided there are no hidden liabilities, the seller always gets their funds.

The selling firm can accept, reject, or attempt to negotiate any offer that is submitted for their company.  Most of the time, the offer price isn’t considered high enough or the other terms don’t coincide with the interests of the selling company’s shareholders.  However, if this can be overcome, more detailed negotiations will ensue, if both parties are willing.  Both parties always retain the ability to reject the transaction if it doesn’t meet their financial and other objectives.  Once the major deal terms are agreed, the parties will execute a Letter of Intent, which is a non-binding document, but captures the major terms and conditions of a potential transaction.

In order to complete a successful transaction, a large amount of collaboration and negotiation between the buyer and seller is required.  Most importantly, both parties must understand each other’s objectives and it’s always helpful if both sides believe in win-win negotiating. 

The importance of understanding each other’s objectives can be demonstrated by the following story.  Two sisters were fighting over an orange and in order to resolve the argument, their father cut the orange in half and gave one half of the orange to each of his daughters.   While this seems like the best solution, both sisters actually ended up with a bad deal.  One sister wanted the rind for cooking while the other sister wanted to eat the orange.  Hence, both of them actually lost.  Instead, if the two sisters had understood each other’s objectives, the orange could have been divided in a much better way, the rind to one and the contents to the other.  The moral of the story is to try to understand the other side’s needs and objectives with a view towards finding middle ground or a compromise.  An experienced M&A advisor will know how to conduct these M&A negotiations so that they are productive, efficient, and result in a successful transaction.

Versailles Group is a 29-year-old Boston-based investment bank that specializes in international mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures.  Versailles Group’s skill, flexibility, and experience have enabled it to successfully close M&A transactions for companies with revenues between US$2 million and US$250 million.  Versailles Group has closed transactions in all economic environments, literally around the world.

Versailles Group provides clients with both buy-side and sell-side M&A services, and has been completing cross-border transactions since its founding in 1987.  More information on Versailles Group, Ltd. can be found at www.versaillesgroup.com.

For more information, please contact

Donald Grava

Founder and President

+617-449-3325

May 3, 2016