
In M&A transactions, an escrow or a holdback is used to ensure that certain conditions are met by the seller before an agreed amount of funds is released. These structures help allocate risk between buyer and seller and are common in middle-market business sales.
If an escrow is used, a third party known as the escrow agent holds the funds until receiving instructions that certain obligations have been satisfied and the funds can be released. Most of the time, the escrow agent is a large, reputable bank or trust company that provides this service.
In middle-market transactions, escrow and holdback structures are often heavily negotiated and can materially impact a seller’s net proceeds, timing of payment, and overall risk exposure.
How Escrow Accounts Work
The escrow agent holds the funds pursuant to an escrow agreement executed at closing. That agreement governs how claims are submitted, the required notice procedures and timelines, dispute resolution mechanisms, the conditions for release of funds, and the investment of escrowed funds along with the allocation of interest.
In most transactions, escrow funds are invested in low-risk instruments. The interest earned is typically paid to the seller upon release, although this is negotiable.
Despite the fact that escrow accounts are very common in M&A transactions, the specific terms can vary greatly. The average escrow amount typically ranges between 10 percent and 20 percent of the purchase price. The holding period generally ranges from 12 to 24 months following closing. In certain situations, however, both the percentage and the duration may be increased depending on the perceived risk of the transaction.
Why Escrows Are Used
Escrows are designed to protect buyers against unforeseen financial losses after closing. Buyers are often concerned that undisclosed liabilities may surface once the transaction is complete.
Funds are typically released to the seller at pre-agreed times. Sometimes, partial releases occur as early as six months after closing. It would be unusual for the entire escrow to be released that early, but buyers and sellers frequently agree to release portions after six or twelve months if no claims have been made.
The funds are released only if all agreed obligations have been fulfilled. If unknown liabilities arise, or if the seller fails to meet certain pre-agreed conditions outlined in the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the buyer may have the right to recover amounts from the escrow.
Provided the agreed conditions are met, escrow funds ultimately belong to the seller. Buyers do not expect escrow funds to be returned to them. Rather, the escrow serves as a protection mechanism in the event issues arise.
Because the funds are held by a neutral third party and can only be released in accordance with the escrow agreement, escrows can reduce a seller’s risk of not being paid.
The Alternative: Holdbacks
The alternative to an escrow is a holdback. In this structure, the buyer simply retains a certain percentage of the transaction consideration instead of depositing it with a third-party escrow agent.
In some transactions, a holdback is used to secure a specific known risk such as a pending tax matter, while general indemnification risk is covered through a separate escrow.
The primary risk of a holdback is that the funds remain in the buyer’s possession. If the buyer were to go bankrupt or otherwise become unable to pay, the seller could face increased credit risk. While such situations are uncommon, this risk is one reason many sellers prefer the added protection of a formal escrow arrangement.
Representation and Warranty Insurance (RWI)
In recent years, representation and warranty insurance, often referred to as RWI, has become more prevalent in middle-market transactions. RWI allows an insurance policy to cover certain breaches of representations and warranties, which can reduce the need for larger escrow amounts.
For sellers, this can increase cash received at closing, reduce post-closing exposure, and improve overall deal competitiveness. However, RWI does not eliminate escrow entirely and often excludes known risks. It is typically used as a complement to traditional escrow structures.
Escrow accounts and holdbacks are important tools for allocating risk in M&A transactions. While they are standard components of many deals, their structure, size, and duration can significantly affect a seller’s ultimate proceeds and risk profile.
Written by Don Grava
Founded in 1987, Versailles Group is a boutique investment bank that specializes in international mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures. Versailles Group’s skill, flexibility, and experience have enabled it to successfully close M&A transactions for companies in the middle and lower-middle market. Versailles Group has closed transactions in all economic environments, literally around the world.
Versailles Group provides clients with both buy-side and sell-side M&A services and has been completing cross-border transactions since its founding in 1987.
More information on Versailles Group, Ltd. can be found at
www.versaillesgroup.com
For additional information, please contact
Donald Grava
Founder and President
+617-449-3325