Cross-border mergers and acquisitions are playing an increasingly central role in corporate growth strategies. For middle-market companies in particular, these transactions offer compelling paths to expansion, diversification, and long-term value creation. Yet, while cross-border M&A can unlock transformative opportunities, it also introduces significant complexity.

Navigating different legal systems, regulatory regimes, and business cultures requires strategic planning and careful execution. Success depends not just on identifying the right target or buyer, but on managing integration, risk, and stakeholder alignment from day one. With the right guidance, however, these challenges can be converted into a competitive advantage.

Versailles Group specializes in advising middle-market companies on cross-border M&A transactions, helping business owners realize their international ambitions. This article explores the advantages and the disadvantages of cross-border M&A and outlines how these complex deals can be structured for success.

What Is a Cross-Border M&A Transaction?

A cross-border M&A transaction involves the acquisition, merger, or joint venture between companies located in different countries. In contrast to domestic deals, cross-border transactions must account for multiple jurisdictions, foreign investment controls, regulatory clearances, and other international considerations.

These transactions may take the form of a full acquisition, a partial equity investment, or the creation of a new jointly owned entity. While deal structures vary, they all involve some transfer of control, influence, or shared governance across borders.

For middle-market and founder-led businesses, cross-border M&A is increasingly used to support succession planning, enable international expansion, or optimize a portfolio by divesting non-core operations. These transactions are often driven by a need to unlock new capital sources, access unique capabilities, or achieve valuations not possible within the domestic market.

The Key Advantages of Cross-Border M&A

Cross-border deals can be transformative for companies seeking to scale, innovate, or reposition themselves in a globalized economy. The benefits often extend well beyond immediate financial gain.

Access to New Markets and Customers

One of the most powerful advantages of cross-border M&A is immediate entry into new geographic markets. Acquiring or merging with a company abroad provides instant access to established customer relationships, local distribution channels, licenses, and brand recognition.

Rather than building a presence from the ground up, companies gain a functioning platform with local talent and infrastructure already in place. This allows for faster revenue generation, accelerated growth, and reduced execution risk compared to organic market entry.

For owner-led companies, this strategic leap can be the difference between incremental expansion and a credible international footprint.

Diversification of Revenue and Risk

Cross-border transactions enable companies to diversify beyond the economic, regulatory, and political risks of their home market. Exposure to new customer segments, industries, or currencies provides a more balanced and resilient revenue stream.

This kind of geographic diversification can be particularly useful for companies heavily reliant on a specific market or industry vertical. By entering regions with different growth cycles or regulatory dynamics, businesses can offset cyclical downturns and stabilize earnings over time.

This broader footprint also enhances appeal to investors and lenders who value diversified cash flows and global scale.

Access to Talent, Technology, and Innovation

Many companies pursue cross-border M&A to acquire capabilities not available in their domestic markets. Whether it’s advanced R&D, proprietary technologies, or skilled labor, these assets can dramatically accelerate innovation and strengthen a company’s competitive position.

Cross-border deals often involve management teams with deep local knowledge and functional expertise. For founder-led businesses, this influx of talent can professionalize operations and provide the leadership needed to scale more effectively.

In industries undergoing rapid technological change, acquiring innovation rather than building it internally may be the most efficient and strategic path forward.

Economies of Scale and Operational Efficiencies

When structured thoughtfully, cross-border combinations offer opportunities for cost reduction and operational efficiency. Shared services, centralized procurement, logistics optimization, and facility consolidation can all deliver meaningful savings.

In addition to reducing costs, cross-selling opportunities can be unlocked by combining complementary product portfolios or introducing one company’s offerings into the other’s markets.

Together, these efficiencies can enhance profitability, improve margins, and create a more compelling platform for future growth or exit.

Strategic Positioning and Global Competitiveness

Cross-border M&A also plays a critical role in strategic positioning. Establishing a presence in key international markets allows companies to compete more effectively with global incumbents, gain access to scarce resources, and shape competitive dynamics before rivals can respond.

Private equity sponsors and family offices pursuing platform strategies often use cross-border acquisitions to consolidate fragmented industries or secure differentiated assets in high-growth regions. For many, it is a proactive way to shape the future competitive landscape.

The Key Disadvantages and Risks of Cross-Border M&A

While the rewards of cross-border M&A can be significant, the risks are equally real. These transactions demand careful analysis and experienced execution to avoid value erosion.

Regulatory and Legal Complexity

Navigating multiple legal systems is one of the most challenging aspects of cross-border M&A. Transactions must comply with local competition laws, foreign investment restrictions, labor regulations, sector-specific rules, and tax regimes, each of which may differ significantly across jurisdictions.

In some cases, government approvals are required to complete the deal. Regulators may impose conditions, delay proceedings, or block transactions on grounds ranging from national security to market concentration.

As a result, cross-border transactions often involve longer timelines, higher advisory costs, and elevated execution risk. Early assessment of regulatory exposure and careful deal structuring are essential to preserving momentum and value.

Cultural and Organizational Integration Challenges

Cultural differences can undermine even the most financially sound deals. Differences in national values, corporate culture, and leadership style can affect communication, decision-making, and trust, all of which are key factors in any integration process.

Poorly managed cultural integration can lead to the loss of key employees, a decline in productivity, and the erosion of customer relationships. This risk is particularly acute for founder-led companies where the business culture is often closely tied to the owner’s identity.

A well-thought-out integration plan that respects cultural differences and builds alignment is crucial to unlocking operational value and maintaining performance post-close.

Political, Economic, and Currency Risk

Cross-border transactions expose businesses to political and economic risks beyond their control. Changes in foreign government policy, trade restrictions, sanctions, or taxation laws can significantly alter the financial attractiveness or feasibility of a deal.

Currency fluctuations and inflation add further risk. Volatile exchange rates can impact both deal pricing and future earnings when cash flows are converted into the buyer’s base currency.

Without adequate hedging or contractual safeguards, these risks can materially affect valuation, leverage ratios, and return expectations.

Tax, Structuring, and Compliance Challenges

International transactions require careful tax planning. Multiple tax regimes, withholding taxes, transfer pricing, and bilateral treaties must all be considered. Poor structuring can result in double taxation, inefficient capital flows, and unexpected liabilities.

Furthermore, compliance obligations, ranging from data privacy laws to ESG disclosures and anti-corruption standards, vary across jurisdictions. Ensuring compliance often requires significant upgrades to internal systems, controls, and governance frameworks.

These hidden costs and obligations must be accounted for upfront to avoid erosion of value over time.

Valuation and Due Diligence Complexity

Differences in accounting standards, disclosure practices, and market transparency make it harder to accurately assess the performance and value of foreign companies. The risk of information asymmetry is higher, particularly in less-regulated or unfamiliar markets.

Thorough financial, legal, operational, and cultural due diligence is required. This often necessitates the use of local advisors with deep knowledge of the regulatory environment and business culture. Their insights are essential to validating assumptions, uncovering liabilities, and negotiating protections.

Making Cross-Border Deals Work

Despite these challenges, cross-border M&A can be executed successfully when approached with discipline and forethought.

Strategic Preparation and Clear Deal Thesis

The most successful cross-border transactions are aligned with the company’s long-term strategy. Whether the goal is market entry, scale, or innovation, each deal should be evaluated against defined objectives and measurable outcomes.

Value drivers must be identified early, with a clear understanding of how they will be achieved and over what timeline. This discipline prevents overpayment and supports accountability post-close.

Robust Cross-Border Due Diligence

Effective diligence must go beyond the financials. Regulatory risk, political exposure, cybersecurity, and ESG factors should all be assessed with the help of local experts.

Understanding the target’s relationships, contracts, and cultural dynamics provides a fuller picture of its value and potential pitfalls. This level of insight can shape deal terms, protect against downside, and uncover opportunities for value creation.

Thoughtful Structuring, Financing, and Risk Mitigation

Tax-efficient structures, currency hedging, and contingent payment mechanisms like earn-outs or seller financing help balance risk and reward.

Financing strategies should account for currency composition, interest rate exposure, and covenant flexibility. Governance frameworks, including decision rights and incentive plans, must be tailored to accommodate cross-border coordination and integration.

Integration Planning from the Start

Integration must begin long before the deal closes. A detailed plan covering systems, talent, communication, and cultural alignment ensures momentum is maintained and disruption minimized.

Sequencing integration steps, appointing an experienced integration leader, and involving cross-functional teams across geographies improves execution and safeguards performance.

Where Versailles Group Adds Value

Versailles Group, Ltd., headquartered in Boston, is a global boutique investment bank with four decades of experience advising on mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, company sales, and buy-side transactions. We specialize in serving middle-market companies, entrepreneurs,  and corporate clients across a wide range of industries and geographies.

With deep expertise in cross-border M&A, we provide end-to-end strategic guidance from initial target identification and valuation through deal structuring, regulatory navigation, negotiation, and post-closing integration planning. Every engagement is led by senior professionals and executed with strict confidentiality, personalized attention, and a singular focus on maximizing long-term value for clients worldwide.

A Call to Action for Middle-Market Decision-Makers

For business owners and leadership teams considering cross-border M&A, early engagement with a specialized advisor can make all the difference.

Whether you’re exploring international growth, preparing for succession, or seeking to optimize your portfolio, Versailles Group offers the insight, relationships, and execution expertise needed to unlock the full value of a cross-border transaction.

Written by Don Grava

10 April 2026

About Versailles Group, Ltd.

Founded in 1987, Versailles Group is a boutique investment bank that specializes in international mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures. Versailles Group’s skill, flexibility, and experience have enabled it to successfully close M&A transactions for companies in the middle and lower-middle market. Versailles Group has closed transactions in all economic environments, literally around the world.

Versailles Group provides clients with both buy-side and sell-side M&A services and has been completing cross-border transactions since its founding in 1987.

Speak Confidentially with Versailles Group

If you are considering selling or acquiring a company, we welcome the opportunity to discuss your objectives and offer a clear perspective on your options.

Request a Session >>

In middle-market M&A transactions, few elements attract more attention or skepticism than the financial forecast. Among them, the so-called hockey stick projection has become a familiar feature of deal materials. Historical performance appears steady or modest, followed by a sharp acceleration in projected growth shortly after acquisition.

For founders preparing to sell their businesses, these projections often reflect genuine optimism about untapped opportunities. For buyers, however, they frequently represent one of the primary sources of post-acquisition disappointment.

Understanding why hockey stick projections emerge, and how sophisticated acquirers evaluate them, is critical for owners seeking a successful transaction and a durable valuation.

The Appeal and the Problem

A hockey stick projection is visually compelling. Years of stable growth are followed by a pronounced upward trajectory driven by expected investments, expanded sales capacity, pricing improvements, or entry into new markets. The underlying message is straightforward: the business has performed well historically but is positioned for materially faster growth under new ownership.

In founder-led companies, this narrative often contains elements of truth. Many businesses operate with constrained capital, limited management depth, or underdeveloped sales infrastructure. Owners reasonably believe that additional resources could unlock growth.

The difficulty arises when projected acceleration exceeds what operating realities can support.

Most middle-market businesses grow incrementally rather than discontinuously. Sustained step changes in performance typically require structural shifts such as new distribution channels, differentiated products, regulatory change, or meaningful competitive dislocation. Absent these catalysts, sharp inflections rarely occur on the timeline suggested in transaction models.

When projections prove unattainable, consequences extend beyond valuation adjustments. Buyers may face impaired returns, strained management relationships, and integration challenges driven by missed expectations rather than operational weakness.

Why Sellers Gravitate Toward Aggressive Forecasts

The incentives surrounding a sale naturally encourage optimistic projections.

Valuations are influenced by expected future earnings. Higher growth assumptions often support higher multiples, particularly when buyers underwrite forward performance rather than trailing results. Even modest increases in projected growth can materially change perceived enterprise value.

Founders also carry deep conviction about their businesses. Years of operating experience create a clear view of unrealized opportunities: customers not yet pursued, geographic expansion delayed, or investments postponed to preserve cash flow. When presented to a well-capitalized buyer, these possibilities can feel immediately achievable.

Importantly, optimism is not usually intentional misrepresentation. It is more often a combination of belief, hindsight, and the assumption that additional resources will translate directly into execution.

Experienced buyers recognize this dynamic and focus less on intent and more on evidence.

Common Warning Signs Buyers Evaluate

Sophisticated acquirers rarely dismiss projections outright, but they do look for signals that forecasts may be aspirational rather than operational.

A primary concern arises when projected growth materially exceeds historical performance without a clearly observable catalyst. A company that has grown steadily at 10 percent annually may accelerate, but sustained growth above 25 percent typically requires demonstrable change already underway.

Another frequent issue is reliance on undefined operational improvements. Forecasts sometimes attribute growth to better sales execution, pricing optimization, or efficiency gains described as straightforward initiatives. Buyers often ask a simple question: if these actions are readily achievable, why have they not already been implemented?

Lack of operational detail is another indicator. Credible forecasts are built from specific drivers such as pipeline conversion rates, identifiable customer expansion opportunities, hiring timelines, and measurable capacity constraints. Broad references to market share gains or strategic positioning without supporting analysis tend to receive limited underwriting credit.

Buyers also scrutinize assumptions that imply performance exceeding established industry benchmarks. Middle market companies rarely leap from average operating metrics to best-in-class performance without sustained investment and execution risk.

How Buyers Test Growth Assumptions

During diligence, experienced acquirers rebuild forecasts independently rather than validating seller models.

Historical performance is analyzed at a granular level, including customer concentration, cohort behavior, pricing trends, and margin stability. Buyers develop bottom-up projections grounded in observed operating patterns, then compare results with management forecasts to identify gaps.

Customer conversations often provide the most reliable perspective. Discussions with key accounts help assess expansion potential, competitive positioning, and pricing tolerance. These insights frequently moderate expectations around wallet share growth or cross-selling opportunities.

Market analysis provides another reality check. Independent research into industry growth rates, competitive intensity, and customer switching behavior helps determine whether projected market share gains are achievable within normal operating constraints.

Scenario modeling then evaluates downside outcomes alongside base cases. Rather than asking whether projections are possible, buyers assess how sensitive returns are if growth arrives later or at a lower rate than expected.

Structuring Transactions Around Uncertainty

Because projections inherently involve uncertainty, disciplined buyers often structure transactions to balance risk between parties.

Earnouts and contingent consideration link a portion of purchase price to future performance. While founders may prefer certainty, these structures allow buyers to recognize upside potential without fully paying for unproven growth at closing.

Valuation frameworks also tend to emphasize current or near term earnings rather than distant projections. Cash flows beyond several years are discounted heavily, reflecting execution risk and changing market conditions.

For founders, this approach does not necessarily reduce value. Businesses that achieve projected growth typically deliver strong returns for buyers even when acquired at conservative assumptions. More importantly, realistic underwriting increases transaction certainty and reduces renegotiation risk late in a process.

A More Durable Path to Value

The most successful middle-market transactions align projections with operational credibility.

Buyers are not seeking pessimistic forecasts. They are seeking forecasts they can underwrite with confidence. Companies that present measured growth assumptions supported by clear execution plans often generate stronger competitive tension than those relying on aggressive financial narratives.

For founder-led businesses, disciplined forecasting signals maturity, transparency, and management quality. These characteristics reduce perceived risk, and reduced risk is often what ultimately supports premium valuations.

In M&A, value is rarely created by projecting extraordinary growth. More often, it is created by demonstrating that future performance is achievable, repeatable, and grounded in the realities of how the business already operates.

Written by Don Grava

19 February 2026

About Versailles Group, Ltd.

Founded in 1987, Versailles Group is a boutique investment bank that specializes in international mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures. Versailles Group’s skill, flexibility, and experience have enabled it to successfully close M&A transactions for companies in the middle and lower-middle market. Versailles Group has closed transactions in all economic environments, literally around the world.

Versailles Group provides clients with both buy-side and sell-side M&A services and has been completing cross-border transactions since its founding in 1987.

Speak Confidentially with Versailles Group

If you are considering selling or acquiring a company, we welcome the opportunity to discuss your objectives and offer a clear perspective on your options.

>> Request a Session

Quarterly M&A Comparison

Global M&A activity in the first quarter of 2016 decreased in comparison to the last eight quarters.

As depicted in the graph below, in terms of volume, Q1 2016 was the lowest in the past two years.  Despite the decrease, there were still approximately 20,000 transactions completed in just three months.

In terms of the aggregate value of M&A transactions, Q1 2016 was not the lowest in the past eight quarters.  Q1 2014 was actually lower.  The reduction of value reflects a slowing of mega-mergers, which sometimes skew the statistics particularly when one is focused on the lower middle market.

In the lower middle market, M&A activity remains robust, but it's important for both buyers and sellers to make sure that they are addressing the entire market.  For example, sellers should make sure that they are contacting buyers internationally.  Buyers should make sure that they are contacting targets in their entire marketplace to insure that they have the ability to comparison shop and complete the best possible transaction.

One of the biggest challenges to completing an M&A transaction is to make sure that the buyer or seller have engaged a well-experienced advisor that has experience in the international arena.  The world has gotten “smaller,” largely due to the improvements in communications.  In the “old” days, say prior to 1982, international telephone calls were extremely expensive, faxes didn’t exist, and telex was a worldwide standard, but slow and expensive.  To summarize, email, cheap telephone calls, etc. have made it easy for people to communicate worldwide.  But, many M&A advisors don’t have the experience to deal with people with different customs and cultures.  Versailles Group has nearly 30 years of dealing with buyers and sellers around the world.  We use a culturally sensitive approach that allows us to successfully complete transactions that increase shareholder value on both sides of the negotiating table.  Win win negotiating always works best!

May 11, 2016

Should you sell your family business? How to decide.

Should you sell your family business? How to decide.

In our previous blog, we outlined some important reasons why entrepreneurs should consider selling their businesses (http://www.versaillesgroup.com/ma-deals-when-should-i-sell-my-business/). However, the decision to sell can be complicated by family considerations. Selling a family-owned business can be a difficult process for some, as these businesses often represent the culmination of years or even generations of hard work.

While many entrepreneurs aspire to pass on the family business to their children, doing so may not always be a feasible option. Under these circumstances, you should consider the possible sale of the business as it can provide you and your family with many benefits. Selling a company usually results in a large cash payout, which allows you to pay for your children’s college educations, enables you to retire, and provides financial security for your family. The financial security should not be underestimated. Most business owners have a majority of their net worth tied up in their business. A sale of the company provides them with an opportunity to diversify.

In summary, you should consider selling the family business if:

• No clear successor in the family: If you do not believe any of your children or immediate kin are qualified to run the family business, then selling may actually be the best way to secure their future. In some cases, your children do not have an interest in the family business and would like to explore different opportunities. In other cases, your children may lack the appropriate skills to properly manage the company. Either way, if these succession issues are not addressed, they can damage the value of the business and financial security of the family.

• The business is causing strain among family members: If managing the business is causing strains on family relationships, then selling the business outright may be your best option. A family business cannot run properly if personal relationships are distracting management. Under these conditions, it may be better to sell the company in order to reward the family with a large payout that will allow family members to pursue new ventures.

• You want to instill entrepreneurial values within your own children: As an entrepreneur, you may wish your children to experience the same discovery process that you did when you were building your business. However, passing on your family-owned company as inheritance may actually inhibit the development of these values within your children by depriving them of the opportunity to forge their own paths through life. By selling the business, you can secure your finances for retirement, preserve the legacy of your business if it is acquired by an experienced operator, and provide your children with the capital they will need to develop their own entrepreneurial pursuits.

For more information, please contact

Donald Grava

617-449-3325

Why Hire an Investment Banker for Acquisitions

Why Hire an Investment Banker for Acquisitions

When acquiring other companies, corporations usually have many resources at their disposal, for example they can utilize their corporate development team, finance department, in-house counsel, etc. Consequently, management may feel that hiring an investment banker is an unnecessary expense. This is particularly true if management is not able to see the true value that a banker brings to the acquisition process.

The following are some of the value added features that an investment banker would bring to the process of completing a successful acquisition or answer the simple question: why hire an investment banker for acquisitions.

Appearance of Neutrality

When attempting to purchase another company, especially a competitor in the same industry, corporations face the challenge of appearing as genuinely interested. Many times, when an acquirer contacts a target in the same industry, they are seen as a competitor attempting to obtain sensitive information. An investment banker plays an important role in breaking down this barrier. Even though the banker is working for the acquirer, there is an appearance of neutrality. Consequently, target companies feel more comfortable dealing with an investment banker, particularly because they know he or she knows how to handle confidential information.

Target companies also feel that an acquirer that has hired an investment banker is truly serious as the buyer has made a commitment of time and money with regard to the investment banker’s participation in the transaction. Conversely, buyers without representation appear as less serious or only interested in obtaining confidential information.

Better Relationships Post Closing

The buy-side investment banker plays a critical role when representing the buyer. He or she can negotiate aggressively on the buyer’s behalf. After the transaction is closed, the buyer and seller can work together as they were not the ones fighting over value and terms. If these two parties had negotiated fiercely with one another during the merger, relations post-closing will be strained.

Thus, by utilizing an investment banker, the acquirer’s relationship with the target will be better post-closing. This is another critical role that an investment banker plays as the future success of an acquisition is dependent on the smooth integration of management teams post-closing, particularly if there are any contingent payments.

Objectivity

During the M&A process, it is invaluable to have a resource that can provide an objective opinion on the best acquisition strategy, valuation, and other matters. Corporations, even those with large staffs, may not be able to examine the full ramifications of an acquisition target post-closing. An experienced investment banker can help the buyer gain the perspective that is needed to complete a successful acquisition. This assessment covers the gambit of strategic, tactical, valuation, terms, negotiating tactics, structure, etc. Only an independent investment banker will be able to provide an objective third party view to a buyer.

Conclusion

There are many reasons why an investment banker can add real value to the acquisition process. They add an aura of neutrality, better relationships for buyer and seller post-closing, objectivity, and expertise with all of the moving parts that make up an acquisition transaction. This should answer the important question of why hire an investment banker for acquisitions.

Why Hire An Investment Banker?

Why Hire An Investment Banker?

Entrepreneurs and CEOs are driven individuals with a passion for their businesses. They are go-getters that take the initiative in almost every aspect of their company. For these reasons it is no surprise that when it comes to M&A, many entrepreneurs and CEOs feel they can do it themselves. These individuals have successfully run their business for years or possibly even decades and may ask themselves “why hire an investment banker?”

While some entrepreneurs and CEOs are capable of completing M&A transactions, the majority of these business leaders are not. The result is that they tend to complete deals for less than maximum value or end up with a transaction with less than optimal terms. An investment banker plays a crucial role in achieving the most value in a transaction and best terms in ways that are not always apparent to entrepreneurs and CEOs.

Appearance of Neutrality

When attempting to sell to another company, especially a competitor in the same industry, entrepreneurs and CEOs face the challenge of presenting themselves as genuinely interested. Many buyers shy away from dealing directly with entrepreneurs, particularly in the lower middle market because they know that they simply don’t have the proper experience to complete a transaction. An experienced investment banker can provide the seller with the appropriate guidance on how to conduct an auction, respond to offers, cope with due diligence, negotiate the terms and conditions, etc.

Better Relationships Post Closing

When a company sale takes place and the entrepreneur or other owner-managers stay with the business, both the buyer and seller management teams must learn to work together as fellow employees. If these two parties have been negotiating fiercely with one another during the merger, relations post-closing will be strained. An investment banker negotiating on behalf of the seller can act as a shield between their client and the other party. By utilizing an investment banker, a party has greater leeway in terms of the negotiating tactics that can be used because post-closing the “blame” for the use of those tactics can be placed on the investment banker, not on the seller. This is one of the critical roles that an investment banker plays as the true measure of a successful transaction is frequently the smooth integration of management teams post-closing.
Objectivity

During the sales process, there are bound to be unexpected challenges that arise, particularly for the seller. In these instances, it is invaluable to have a resource that can provide an objective opinion on what is the best strategy to proceed. Entrepreneurs and CEOs that are closely tied to a business may, understandably, take “bumps” in the process personally. Having an experienced advisor in these situations can help to ease tensions, formulate a measured response even in difficult situations, and keep the transaction moving forward.

Thus, we have the answer to why hire an investment banker. The M&A advisor can assist in many ways that most entrepreneurs or CEOs can’t envision. Careful management of the M&A process by the investment banker will result in higher valuations, better terms, and support better relationships between the buyer and seller post-closing. Therefore, sellers should hire an experienced investment bank with many years of experience. Versailles Group, founded in 1987, has completed a large number of successful transactions for entrepreneurs and corporate managers worldwide.

Regulation A – Regulation A+

Regulation A – Regulation A+

This blog offers a brief summary of Regulation A and Regulation A+ offerings. Obviously, this is a very complex matter with a number of issues that would have to be addressed by the issuer with a FINRA-registered broker dealer coupled with a well-experienced securities attorney.

Historically, Regulation A or Reg A offerings have been utilized. In fact, from 2012 to 2014, only 26 Regulation A offerings were qualified by the SEC. Reg A offerings have not been popular because of (i) the offering costs, (ii) the burden of an SEC review, and (iii) the necessity of complying with the state blue sky laws in each state where an offering is conducted. The other issue with Regulation A offerings is that they were restricted to offerings of less than US$5 million.

Regulation A+ or Reg A+ was adopted to implement the rule-making mandate of Title IV of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (commonly referred to as the JOBS Act), which was signed into law in April 2012. One of the major changes of Regulation A+ is that it now allows an issuer to offer and sell up to US$50 million of securities over a 12 month period in a public offering, without complying with the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

Regulation A+ provides for two tiers of offerings; Tier 1 offerings of up to US$20 million in any 12 month period and Tier 2 offerings for up to US$50 million in any 12 month period. Each Tier has its own unique offering requirements which should be discussed with a registered broker dealer, for example, Tier 2 offerings of Reg A+ introduces an investment limitation for non-accredited investors. This limitation does not allow these investors to purchase more than ten percent of the greater of the investor’s annual income or net worth.

Reg A+ limits the securities offered to equity securities, including warrants, debt securities convertible into or exchangeable into equity interests, including guarantees of such securities. There are also other limitations, for example, an issuer cannot be an existing SEC reporting company, a “blank check company,” etc.

Another unique feature of Regulation A+ offerings is that issuers have liability with regard to offers or sales made by means of an offering statement or oral communications that may include a material misleading statement or omission. This liability is not present in offerings made under Rule 506 of Regulation D. Disappointed investors in a Rule 506 offering cannot sue, under the federal securities laws, for negligent misrepresentation. In these cases, the investor must prove actual intent to defraud, or reckless indifference to the truth of the representations made in the offering.
Regulation A+ securities are subject to FINRA Rule 5110, which prohibits FINRA members and their associated persons from participating in any public offering of securities unless they comply with the filing and review requirements of the Rule.

Raising capital is an important tool for entrepreneurs to maintain the necessary funds to grow and expand their businesses. That being said, as a result of a number of frauds, the US Government, the SEC, and FINRA have all developed a number of laws and regulations for the raising of capital. No entrepreneur should ever attempt to raise capital without using a FINRA-registered broker dealer. Versailles Group, Ltd.’s affiliate, VGL Global LLC is a registered broker dealer and has the expertise to assist companies in raising capital.

M&A Deals - 20 Years of M&A

M&A Deals - 20 Years of M&A

Listed below are two charts that show global M&A volume and value for the last 20 years. We thought that these charts would give our readers some insight into M&A over the last two decades.

Overall, it’s interesting to note the increase in M&A activity from 1985. Twenty years ago, M&A was not as popular of a tool as it is today. In the 1980s companies would take the time to identify a new location, design and build a factory, and start selling product. Over the years, management teams have realized that with less risk an existing business could be purchased and produce faster results.

One can also observe the cyclicality of M&A. There were peaks in deal volume in 1991, 2000, and 2007. The increasing activity from 1995 to 2000 was the result of Y2K and the dot com era, which became the dot bomb era!

The takeaway of these charts is that M&A follows financial cycles like all of the economies around the world. In down cycles, one can see that the value of transactions decreased more dramatically than the volume. This means that sellers received less value for their businesses.

We’re all hoping that the current strong M&A markets continue forever, but the reality is that like all cycles it will end. That’s certain. What’s uncertain is the timing.

M&A Deals – Sell Side Considerations

M&A Deals – Sell Side Considerations

With regard to transactions in the middle market, when an entrepreneur begins the sales process of their company, he or she can easily become consumed by the process. This should be one of the most important sell side considerations for an entrepreneur, i.e., how not to get over involved in the process.

In order to complete a successful sale, the entrepreneur must maintain his or her focus on what’s most important, that being the business. This is why it is so critical to have a well-experienced M&A firm handle your transaction. Typically, boutique M&A firms offer middle market companies the best level of service for their transactions. They know how to mitigate the time and effort that an entrepreneur will have to make to the completion of a successful transaction.

The continued strong performance of the company plays an important role in a successful sale, which is why it’s one of the more important sell side considerations. When entrepreneurs neglect their companies during the sales process, they are putting the value of the company at risk. During the sales process for the company, potential acquirers will watch the financial performance of the company closely and will react negatively to any “slip up” in revenues. While a buyer may fully understand that this hiccup in performance was because of management’s focus on the sales process, they won’t hesitate to use this as an opportunity to negotiate a reduction in the value. The best way to avoid this scenario is to make sure that the M&A firm is managing the sales process so that the entrepreneur can stay focused on his or her business.

A knowledgeable financial advisor or boutique M&A firm will be able to tell entrepreneurs what materials potential buyers will want to see and may even populate a data room with such data. Getting this information ready in advance will reduce the stress of numerous data requests from a buyer once due diligence is in full swing.

Throughout the sales process entrepreneurs should always expect the unexpected. An experienced M&A advisor will be able to guide entrepreneurs through the M&A process, which is not always a straight line. As a buyer conducts its due diligence, unforeseen flaws are likely to be discovered. When this occurs, the most effective way to ease a potential buyer’s fears is to present a company that is continuing to perform well. This will not only keep the sales process moving, but will also preserve the value for the business by preventing a price negotiation.

Entrepreneurs selling their business can often times feel like they are performing a juggling act and it may seem as if there are too many things to keep an eye on. This is actually another one of those very important sell side considerations. An experienced boutique M&A firm can be the extra set of hands the entrepreneur needs to maintain the company’s financial performance while also executing a successful sale. With this type of teamwork, the highest value for the business will be obtained and the sales process can be completed in the most efficient manner.

At the risk of being redundant, it’s important for the entrepreneur to make sure that they are hiring a well-qualified M&A advisor with years of experience. They will know how to guide the entrepreneur through a variety of circumstances that always creep into M&A transactions, but are not fatal to completing a successful transaction. There are many sell side considerations and Versailles Group, a boutique M&A firm or investment bank would be happy to explain how to accomplish the best possible results in the sale of your company.

How Do I Sell My High Tech Business

How Do I Sell My High Tech Business

A frequent question is: How Do I Sell My High Tech Business. There are several steps that should be taken to maximize the value and obtain the best terms. These are outlined below.

Marketing the Company for Sale

Selling a high-tech business is a unique experience and special expertise is required to ensure a successful sale. High-tech businesses have many unique selling points that must be effectively highlighted to potential buyers in order to derive the best value. These unique selling points are the primary focus of the Confidential Information Memorandum (“CIM”) which is a detailed report on the company for sale. It outlines the opportunity for the prospective buyers. An effective CIM will clearly describe the company’s strengths, technological advantages, growth prospects, financial data, etc.

Preparing a Global Buyer List

When selling a high-tech business, contacting buyers across the globe is vital. Technology is always in high demand and foreign buyers may be willing to pay a premium for a high-tech business, particularly if a specific technology is not available in their home country. Given the fact that technology is continually changing, the technology portfolio of your company may be attractive to some buyers but undesirable to others. For this reason, it is essential to utilize a broad based, global list of buyers when selling your high-tech business.

Focus Buyers on Future Performance

High-tech businesses can often times have volatile historical financial performance, especially during phases of new product development and introduction. An experienced financial advisor will be able to focus buyers on your company’s future and how your technology can be utilized in tandem with a prospective buyer’s strategy. Framing the acquisition in this way will achieve a higher valuation for the business and better terms.

Maintaining Confidentiality

Confidentiality throughout the sales process is paramount. An experienced financial advisor will ensure that strict Non-Disclosure Agreements are in place before sharing non-public information with potential buyers. When selling your high-tech business, it is critical to protect your technology as it is often the key factor that distinguishes your firm from your competitors. A financial advisor will be able to control the sales process in such a fashion that enough information is revealed to prospective buyers to garner interest and derive value, but not enough to copy your firm’s technology portfolio.

An experienced financial advisor will guide you throughout the process of selling your high-tech business. By focusing prospective buyers on your company’s unique selling points and growth prospects, the valuation for your high-tech business can be significantly increased. This approach, completed by firm with years of international experience, will always answer the question: How Do I Sell My High Tech Business.