A critical function of a sell-side advisor during an M&A transaction is the creation of a comprehensive buyer list. During the screening process of potential buyers, your M&A advisor must be thorough in their analysis of both potential strategic and financial buyers. This detailed analysis can heavily contribute towards the success of a sell-side M&A engagement. Several factors are examined when developing a buyer list including but not limited to the financial capacity of an acquiring firm, potential synergies, and current market share.

If the list of potential buyers isn’t well-researched, there’s a risk that the “right” buyer may miss the opportunity to bid on the company. This could be an expensive mistake for the seller.

It is crucial that the sell-side advisor understand the potential buyers and what might motivate them. Having a thorough understanding of their strategies, operations, and financial stability is essential in marketing the business for sale. Your M&A advisor must help potential buyers understand how synergies can be realized through the acquisition of a client’s firm. This is an important step as it will help the potential buyer to truly understand the value of the business for sale.

Boutique investment banks with a global reach are capable of developing a comprehensive worldwide prospective buyer list. A list that is not limited by geographies, language, or customs will allow the best possible acquirer to be discovered so that the best value and terms can be derived for the seller. M&A experience is equally important as investment banks with decades of transaction experience will be more capable of helping potential buyers understand the synergies that can be realized through acquisition, are better equipped to deal with buyers from around the world, structure the transaction, and know how to manage the process to a successful conclusion.

In M&A transactions, an escrow or a holdback is used to insure that certain conditions are met by the seller before an agreed amount of funds is released to the seller. If an escrow is used, an escrow agent, a third party, holds the funds until receiving instructions that certain obligations have been met and the funds can be released. Most of the time, the escrow agent is a large reputable bank that offers that service.

Despite the fact that the use of an escrow is very common in M&A transactions, the terms of such accounts can vary greatly. The average escrow amount usually ranges between 10 and 20 percent of the purchase price and the period that the funds are held ranges, on average, from 12 to 24 months from the date the deal is closed. Sometimes, in particular situations, both the amount and the time period are dramatically increased.

Escrows are held for some period of time to protect the buyers of a business against any unforeseen financial losses after the closing. Buyers are usually worried that undisclosed liabilities will appear after closing. Typically, the funds are released to the seller at pre-agreed times, sometimes as early as six months after closing. It would be highly unusual for the whole amount to be released after such a short period of time; however, buyer and seller frequently agree to release portions of the escrow after six or twelve months. The funds are only released if all of the agreed obligations are fulfilled.

The alternative to an escrow is a holdback. That’s where the buyer just holds back a certain percentage of the transaction consideration. The biggest risk to a holdback is if the buyer goes bankrupt or somehow can’t pay the holdback. While this is very unusual, it’s why many sellers prefer the safety of an escrow.

Escrows can reduce a seller’s risk of not being paid as the funds are held with a neutral third party and can only be released in accordance with the escrow agreement. Buyers do not expect to have escrow funds returned to them; however, if unknown liabilities appear after closing, the escrow protects them as the funds are there and available.

It should be clear that, provided the conditions are met, any funds in an escrow account are for the seller and most times will even earn interest. The funds are only returned to the buyer if unknown liabilities appear or if the seller doesn’t live up to certain pre-agreed conditions as outlined in the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

There are two possible ways to purchase a business; one way is through the acquisition of the company’s assets and the other is effected by buying the company’s shares or capital stock.

Asset acquisitions occur when the buyer purchases all of the company’s tangible and intangible assets from the seller. Tangible assets usually include everything from the company’s accounts receivable, inventory, furniture and fixtures, customer lists, logos, etc. Intangible assets would include things like proprietary technology and know-how, etc. In certain situations, buyers may also assume certain liabilities of the company to be acquired. In yet other circumstances, the acquirer may buy only selected assets.

A stock transaction occurs when the buyer simply purchases the capital stock or shares of the company for sale; in effect, eliminating the transfer of title of all the assets within the company. In this type of transaction, the buyer also “acquires” all of the debts and liabilities of the company.

Tax considerations are often times one of the major determinants in deciding which type of sale is used. When an asset acquisition takes place, the buyer steps-up the tax basis of the assets acquired, which results in increased depreciation and lower taxable income in future periods. In an asset acquisition there may be higher taxes for the seller because the company will have pay tax on the gain from the sale of the assets. The shareholders may also have to pay taxes on their individual gains when funds are distributed from the company. Usually, a good tax advisor can help the selling company and the shareholders to mitigate the taxes related to an asset transaction. Sometimes, these tax considerations complicate the negotiations, but a good M&A advisor should be able develop a fair way to resolve the issue(s).

From a liability standpoint, the acquisition of the company’s capital stock or shares increases the risk for the buyer because all actual or potential liabilities with regard to the selling company are acquired with the capital stock. Consequently, the due diligence process is often times more meticulous in a stock purchase due to these assumed liabilities and the enhanced risk of the transaction. This risk to the buyer can be mitigated by transferring liability back to the seller in the purchase agreement via representations and warranties. The buyer may also require a larger escrow and a longer time period if there are real or perceived risks related to undisclosed or even unknown liabilities.

Acquisitions can be a very productive way to grow a company and to build shareholder value. More specifically, companies make acquisitions for either offensive or defensive reasons.

The key to leveraging acquisitions into a competitive advantage requires the buyer to focus on four specific capabilities, which include (i) carefully developing M&A objectives, (ii) managing your reputation as an acquirer, (iii) maintaining the strategic vision of the target, the buying company, and the transaction, and (iv) managing the integration, especially the expected synergies over time.

M&A objectives need to be clearly outlined. In other words, what is the purpose of the acquisition? A company may make an acquisition to bolster its client list or cover a broader or new geography. Similarly, a company may buy another company for defensive reasons, for example, they may not want a competitor to have the benefit of acquiring the target company. In order to develop proper M&A objectives, a company must go far beyond any initial growth strategy and get to the core of how a potential target will add value. This involves considering the unique characteristics of their own business, their customers, their market, etc. Many times, companies don’t spend enough time developing their M&A objectives. If one is not careful in this analysis, the end result is wasted time, effort, and sometimes the loss of large amounts of money.

It is imperative that an acquirer manage its reputation as a buyer by having positive interactions with sellers. A buyer should always deal with targets fairly, and to the extent possible, in a transparent fashion. The acquiring company should communicate how the target will be assimilated so that the seller understands how it would fit into the bigger, long-term strategy of the buyer. In most cases, the buyer will not, and does not need to, divulge all of its strategies, but sellers like to understand how their companies will add value to the acquirer in the future. When buyers share their vision, sellers usually contribute to that discussion, which only adds more value. By dealing with targets in this way, the buyer builds a positive reputation in the marketplace and ends up by attracting more and better targets over the long term. Some of the world’s largest corporations have done this well and the end result is that even small targets perceive them as attractive buyers. “Attractive buyers” are able to complete more and better transactions whereas buyers that breach confidentiality agreements or do not operate in a professional and ethical way usually find themselves not being able to acquire any companies.

It’s vital that the buyer maintain and/or revise, over time, its strategic vision of itself, the target, and the projected synergies in order to create a truly successful transaction. For many buyers, this connection gets lost during the due diligence phase. Smart buyers will complete not only the standard due diligence, but also strategic due diligence, which will test the hypothesis that the target is in fact a synergistic acquisition. This additional diligence will help insure the long term success of the transaction.

Finally, it’s important for the buyer to keep reassessing the acquisition over the long term. The one constant of every business is that things keep changing. Therefore, the buyer needs to keep assessing the synergies between itself and the acquired company. Synergies that were apparent at the closing of the transaction may nor may not be available 12 or 24 months later. Like all parts of business, value will be created or destroyed as the buyer and seller continue to integrate their businesses over the longer term. If this integration process is managed properly and reassessed regularly, value will be maximized.

In the end, acquisitions can help companies grow and prosper, but only if the M&A process and the subsequent integration are conducted diligently and properly. If done correctly, acquisitions can bolster a company’s offensive position so that it can build shareholder value or enable it to build adequate defenses to protect shareholder value. In most cases, a professional M&A advisor can help guide this process to a successful transaction.

Worldwide, across all sectors, M&A deal volume, for the ten months ending October 2014, has been robust. The four most active sectors in M&A this year have been Financials, Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, and Information Technology. The following chart shows the transaction volume of these four sectors.

Private Equity buyers have a reported US$1 trillion to invest and large corporates are also looking to put their record cash balances to work. With debt financing readily accessible at favorable rates, leveraging acquisitions has proven to be beneficial for some acquirers. These factors are leading to increased demand and higher M&A multiples as demonstrated by the following chart.

There are many steps that need to be taken when organizing the acquisition of a company, division, or product line. Initially, an acquisition strategy needs to be developed. An acquisition strategy is essentially a business plan which acts as a road map for completing a successful acquisition. The objectives of the acquisition search need to be clarified, and potentially, written down. Another important aspect of this plan is to detail the guidelines to be used when screening acquisition candidates. One does not want to get caught wasting time on a target when the probability of closing is too small or on a target that will not add value in the future. A defined acquisition strategy will give the buyer a method to evaluate potential acquisition candidates relative to the stated objectives of making such an acquisition.

Another crucial aspect of a well-defined acquisition strategy is establishing an acquisition team. An acquisition team must have their responsibilities and authorities clearly mapped out. It is also important that different parts of the company are represented within the acquisition team since they may have conflicting interests within the organization. Typically, the owner or CEO is responsible for selecting team members and being aware of any conflict of interests that may exist between parts of the company. For example, the sales people may be focused on selling low margin products whereas finance may only want to acquire targets with high gross margins.

The acquisition team should be comprised of product specialists, finance, legal, marketing, etc. so that the target can be understood at multiple levels. Like any team, the CEO needs to guide the team members to insure that objectives are met, conflicts are minimized, and the resulting acquisition is successful.

Every company is unique in its own way and management knows better than anyone what makes their company different. It is important to understand current market share, manufacturing costs, whether or not you are on the low or high end of the market, where working capital is being utilized, how much marketing is being done, etc. By analyzing these aspects, the buyer will be able to develop an acquisition strategy that compliments the buying company’s strengths and mitigates its weaknesses.

Many times, in middle market transactions, buyer and seller do not agree on the purchase price. One way to bridge the valuation gap between buyer and seller is to structure an earn-out. An earn-out is a payment plan in which the buyer will make additional payments to the seller based upon the performance of the newly acquired business. Earn-outs can be essential to closing M&A transactions in which the buyer and seller cannot agree on the value. Earn-outs are designed to ensure that each party receives fair value as a result of the transaction.

There are several advantages to structuring an earn-out. Earn-outs can reduce negotiation time in cases where neither buyer nor seller can agree on a valuation. An earn-out can help the selling party receive the full value for their business by the seller making specific payments, over time, based on the seller achieving specific performance criteria. Through the use of an earn-out, the selling company may receive more money (or shares) than they would have if the acquisition were a one-time payment at closing. Buyers like the use of earn-outs because it reduces the risk of overpaying for an investment that does not achieve its financial projections. Because of this risk mitigation for both buyer and seller, earn-outs are oftentimes used as a way to make a fair compromise on the purchase price of the target company.

Experienced M&A advisers can help structure and negotiate an earn-out that will be acceptable to both buyer and seller. A well-structured earn-out can be beneficial to all parties involved. The buyer feels confident they are not overpaying for the company because the seller has to achieve certain performance thresholds in order to receive additional payments. The seller is satisfied because additional consideration will be paid if the business does achieve its forecasts. The earn-out has the added benefit of demonstrating to the buyer that the seller believes in the forecasts and that the seller is not in a hurry to exit the business. (Most of the time, the founder or seller of a company stays with the company during the earn-out period to help insure that the company will achieve the desired results.)

One of the most challenging aspects in structuring an M&A transaction is not necessarily the determination of a purchase price, but rather how that purchase price is allocated between the assets being sold. The major conflict at the core of this issue is the existence of tax polarity between the buyer and the seller. Generally speaking, the seller of the business is trying to maximize after tax proceeds while the buyer is trying to minimize the consideration relative to the after tax cash flow of future operations. Given these concerns, sellers typically look to sell stock while buyers usually want to buy assets. (Many times buyers prefer asset purchases because, in most jurisdictions, it limits liability. In Brazil, for example, it does not limit liability.)

Section 1060 of the IRS tax code attempts to mitigate conflicts regarding the allocation of the purchase price to various assets. Under Section 1060, both the buyer and the seller of a business are required to use the residual method for purchase price allocation. This means that the purchase price is first allocated to assets to the extent of their fair market value and any excess will be allocated to goodwill and going concern value.

A purchase price allocation is important to include in a purchase contract between a buyer and a seller because it gives guidance as to the tax consequences of the transaction. An allocation acknowledged by the two parties will allow the buyer to determine the basis of depreciable and amortizable assets while the seller is able to compute the sales price of the individual assets in order to determine any recapture amounts. With an allocation in place, the seller is also able to determine capital gains and ordinary income from an asset sale.

Although coming to an agreement about purchase price allocation can be challenging, having a tax expert and an experienced investment bank negotiating between buyer and seller will help both parties reach agreement on an allocation that is beneficial or at least fair to both parties and that conforms to IRS standards.

When determining the value of a business, there are three basic approaches that can be used to determine the fair market value. These three approaches are the underlying asset approach, the market comparable approach, and the income approach.

The underlying asset approach is a technique in which the assets of the business determine how much it is worth. The assets being valued are both tangible and intangible which means they are considered in the valuation regardless of whether or not they show up on the balance sheet. The final value of the business is determined by a simple formula: Assets – Liabilities = Value of the Business.

Another common method of valuing a firm is the market comparable approach. This is where one compares a business to publicly held firms whose stock is trading. A value is derived by examining the public firm’s EV/EBITDA or EV/Revenue multiples and applying a similar multiple to the non-public, target firm. (EV = Enterprise Value and EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization)

The third way of valuing a company is the income approach. The income approach is based on the company’s potential earnings in the future. The most common way of doing this is by using the discounted cash flow method. The discounted cash flow method (DCF) is where one projects the cash flows that the business will generate and then discount these returns to their present value.

No matter which approach is used, the accuracy of the valuation will depend on the level of detail and depth of analysis that is used in deriving that valuation. It is important to ensure the accuracy of all inputs used in these valuation approaches as these inputs will ultimately impact the value calculation of the target company.

One final note on valuations; “paper” valuations are interesting and useful, but they may or may not be an indication of what a willing buyer may pay a willing seller. Versailles Group has sold a number of businesses for more than any “paper” valuation would have indicated. The key to achieving such a valuation is to have the right buyers and a strong auction.

Versailles Group is pleased to announce the publication of its first eBook, "When To Sell Your Business."

Most entrepreneurs spend more time building their businesses than planning for eventual sale. This guide is meant to assist entrepreneurs in deciding the timing for the sale of their business.

To download your copy, please follow the link at the top of the page.